Thanks to MTAMM for her post yesterday on kids and religion. I've been thinking about it for years, actually, and I don't even have a kid yet. Some people have accused me of over-intellectualizing things. Well, of over-thinking them, but I had to intellectualize it up a bit.
A couple of years ago, Mrs. Rodius and I went to dinner with Big Brother and his wife. Because Mrs. Rodius and I were thinking about maybe beginning to consider the idea of having kids someday, I naturally jumped right to thinking about the religious education of our not yet even theoretical children. Of course!
So we got well into an interesting conversation. Big Brother and SWSIL (Social Worker Sister-in-Law), like many of the commenters on Minivan Mom's site, did not participate in organized religion, but did, at least in SWSIL's case, believe in God. I don't recall if Big Brother said he did or not. But they tried to live spiritual lives, and taught their children that many people believe many different things, and that that's OK.
On a side note, their 8-year-old daughter may or may not have had occasion this month to explain to her Baptist grandmother that she's Greek. As in, she believes in the Greek gods and goddesses. I never did hear the rest of that story. I'm sure it's bound to be a good one.
Anyway, we were deeply involved in our religious education conversation, with me wondering aloud if, by attempting to teach your kids all religions, you effectively teach them none. It seemed to me that it's more likely for a person to embrace a religion if he does so at a young age. And for a young person to embrace a religion, it seemed to me that he would have to be indoctrinated in it, not just educated in it. I don't think Mrs. Rodius, Big Brother, or SWSIL necessarily agreed with that position, though.
Suddenly, a woman from the table next to ours rolled her chair over to join our conversation. I'm not sure why Olive Garden has chairs with casters on them; perhaps it is to reduce the chance for abdominal injury by encouraging patrons to wheel their overly-full bellies well away from the table before attempting to stand. Or maybe it's just to make it easier for strangers to insert themselves into your conversation. I'm sure it was the subject matter that made her feel welcome to participate. If we'd been discussing the relative merits of a variety of sexual positions, she may not have felt so comfortable offering her own opinion on the matter.
I don't really remember now what she contributed, probably because I spent the entire time she was talking drowning her out with my own internal monologue of, "What the hell?" over and over again. I vaguely recall her taking the pro position on formal religious education. I also recall thinking that she wasn't quite understanding any of the counter-arguments that Big Brother or I may have tried to employ. But mostly I remember thinking, "What the hell?"
So I don't really think that conversation resolved any of my uncertainties of the time. I think I mostly just tabled those uncertainties until a later date. Myself? I'd call myself an atheist if I wasn't afraid God would strike me dead for my arrogance. I was not brought up with any particular religion. I attended services at a Presbyterian church for a few years with my mother and Big Brother. I was never deeply touched by the dogma or the services. I thought the giant cross was pretty cool. I enjoyed the grape juice and hawaiian bread. I liked to contemplate the practical mechanics of things like the distribution of the bread and "wine" and passing the collection plate. I wondered where one could get the plastic shot glasses for the wine in such bulk, or the red-velvet-and-brass carrying case with holes custom sized to fit those plastic shot glasses. Mom had her own spirituality going on, but she wasn't very open about it with her kids at the time, though she is much more so now.
I had regular playdates for awhile with the niece and nephew. Once, when I asked the niece (who is now Greek), what she wanted to do for our next playdate, she decided that she wanted to go to services at the Lutheran church where her little brother was attending pre-school. She glowed with delight when I showed up at her house to pick her up wearing dress clothes (including a tie, and shoes that were neither sandals nor tennis shoes. But it wasn't a suit. I don't own a suit.). If you knew me, you'd know that such an outfit is almost unheard of for me. I thought when she suggested it that maybe this would be the occasion that would open my heart to the church. The people there were very warm and welcoming, and I could imagine myself becoming a part of their community, volunteering to help at the barbecues, and so on. But the service itself just did not resonate with me. We stood when were supposed to stand, we sang when we were supposed to sing. We listened when we were supposed to listen. Neither the substance nor the ritual sounded an echoing tone in my heart.
So thinking of young Thumper and his religious education, I wonder:
Is it possible to indoctrinate your child into a religion without participating in it yourself?
If you teach a child that there are many religions in the world, and all of them have equal relative merits, are you not also teaching your child that none of them is actually right and true?
Is it possible to teach children to be ethical and compassionate without teaching them that there are grave and eternal consequences for not being so?
Thursday, July 26, 2007
Religioso
Labels:
Family,
Musings,
Religion,
Reminiscing,
The Coming of Thumper
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
(stretching my fingers, because they're about to fly)
First, I love love love that your niece is Greek. I got really into Greek mythology in middle school, and really WANTED to believe that all those cool gods and goddesses existed.
Next, this Olive Garden had to be in Texas, right? Because then it makes perfect sense that a random woman would roll up and offer her religious opinion (which of COURSE would be that you need to get your as yet unborn children in religious education. Or else you go to Hell. With a capital H.)
On to your questions -
"Is it possible to indoctrinate your child into a religion without participating in it yourself?"
Teach? Yes. Indoctrinate? Methinks no. If you accept a definition of indoctrinate as "To imbue with a partisan or ideological point of view", then I have a hard time believing you can really "imbue" someone when you are preaching something that you yourself don't believe. But then, why would you WANT to indoctrinate your children in something you don't believe in? That makes no sense to me.
"If you teach a child that there are many religions in the world, and all of them have equal relative merits, are you not also teaching your child that none of them is actually right and true?"
Let me give you my partisan Unitarian answer to this. It is not our jobs as parents, when it comes to religious and spiritual matters, to teach your child what is "right and true". You are supposed to equip your children with as much knowledge and reflective thinking skills as possible and then allow them to make up their own mind.
That is why in the UU religious education program, you spend grades k-7 learning about different ideas, religions and beliefs, and then you spend grade 8 reflecting on what YOU believe, culminating in a "coming of age" ceremony where you declare your beliefs to the congregation. It's so beautiful and perfectly aligned with my spirituality I could cry.
But then, ask a devout Christian or Jew or Muslim this same question, and you would get a dramatically different answer. Because their faiths rest on that faith being the RIGHT and TRUE faith. Which is why I can't buy into any of them.
"Is it possible to teach children to be ethical and compassionate without teaching them that there are grave and eternal consequences for not being so?"
This question seems so obvious that I can only shrug and say "but of course". I believe that human beings have greater consciousness and intelligence than to only "behave" out of fear of eternal damnation. I give us more credit. I don't think Hell exists, but you don't see me taking carte blanche to go around and be an asshole to people. I try to be a good person because it's right, not because I will be punished if I'm not. And I don't think I'm particularly enlightened or brilliant.
Each of them (the many religions in the world)IS right and true, for somebody. The work is to find what is right and true for you. I think you wish that we had "indoctrinated" you at an early age so you would know the answers without having to ask the questions. We expected you to use your keen mind and good heart to find your own path. In the meantime, we think we taught you to live morally and ethically by our words and, more, by our own behavior. And you turned out to be a really good guy and we're proud. I think your struggle now is inevitable and good.
PS. Remember that long road trip when you were 13 and Big Brother was 15, just me and you guys? I tried my darnedest to tell you about my spiritual life and beliefs then, but y'all just yawned and tuned me out. I decided it could wait until later, and now it's later.
Love,
Mom
I have to disagree with my wife on some points. While it may be impossible to indoctrinate your children in a faith without believing it, it is possible to allow them to become indoctrinated in a faith you don't believe.
My father was Episcopalian, and while my mother was Catholic, she never attended Church. I, however, was firmly indoctrinated in the Catholic faith. I attended Catholic schools from Kindergarten through college.
And that is the source of my angst on this subject. Although I will generally refer to myself as a "recovering Catholic," I credit my Catholicism as the foundation of my belief system. Though I may have torn down the house, and completely rebuilt it (and continue to do so), I still have that foundation there.
This is why I struggled for a long time to find the right faith for our children. I attended different churches, I talked to the ministers, I tried to feel comfortable in the pews.
To be honest, I still have yet to find an answer that resonates with me enough to make me want to go to church. Tracey is thrilled with Unitarianism, and I am strongly drawn to the universalist theory. I especially like how they educate the children. But still....Whenever I'm sitting in the church, and people are sitting and standing and singing in unison....I don't know. My spiritualism has evolved into something that is too personal to do it in a group.
I'm digressing. I wanted to speak to your question of ethics and compassion. I think that it is possible to teach ethics without the threat of eternal damnation. In fact, I think that Religion (and specifically Christianity) does more to the detriment of social ethics, because it teaches that it doesn't matter what you do as long as you repent before you die. That's just scary.
Notice the irony that on the one hand, my husband credits his formal religious upbringing for his spiritual foundation...and then turns around and says he doesn't buy into any organized religion.
Like our children are going to suddenly materialize as thoughtful, spiritually evolved and enlightened creatures without any sort of conscientious direction, like Aphrodite from Zeus' head (to use something your niece could relate to)
Never mind me. I'm pissed at "Saint" Richard right now and it's leaking into your blog.
I would want to indoctrinate my child into something in which I don't believe because I think that the lack of a structured, formal religious education at a young age contributes to growing up without faith. I do not wish I'd been indoctrinated so that I could know the answers without asking the questions; I think it would be easier on my child to begin with a foundation of faith that he can begin to question as he gets older and develop into his own brand of spiritualism than to expect that he will be able to go the other direction and build a faith without that "I can't say why I believe, I just do, and why isn't important" foundation. That's a faith that he can shape through a lifetime into "I believe, but I don't agree with the church here, and here." There's an aspect of faith that I don't have that's not based on questions and answers, it just is. And that, I think, is best instilled by telling your kid it's true, repeatedly, and at a young age. I just don't know if I can do that.
On the ethical and compassionate point, I think that they can be separate from belief in a holy retribution. I just don't know how many other people think so. I've heard it said that politicians must be religious, because you must be religious to be moral, and you must be moral to be ethical, because without the threat of God's wrath, there is no transcendent human motivation to be decent.
I can see your point, I just totally disagree with it. Maybe that comes from my utter and complete lack of religious upbringing - yet, I still have a lot of faith. I'm a tremendously spiritual person, but I didn't (and don't) need a book or a clergyperson telling me what I should and should not be faithful towards.
I just can't get past the hypocrisy of raising your children in an organization that you don't believe to be true. I understand your justification that you feel the "faith" that you are instilling in your children is the end that justifies the means...but don't you think down the line your child(ren) will question why you did what you did? Don't you think they'll call you on it? And do you think they'll agree with your rationalization?
I'm probably coming across harsher and more judgemental than I mean to be - and I know you will do a fantastic job with Thumper no matter what you decide. I just think that you aren't giving young minds and hearts enough credit. You can raise a child to have an awe of something larger than ourselves without indoctrinating them in a dogma that rests on intimidation and blind obedience. I am in a struggle right now with Bailey that I know I would not be having if I had him in a more "party line" religious education program - but I would FAR prefer this struggle than to be drilling some (to me) false belief into his impressionable head. At least now I'm only battling other 7 year olds on the playground - far easier than a priest or minister who holds a position of power and authority.
And as for politicians needing to be religious - that is why the United States scares me and I want to move to Canada (or Europe). I prefer my politicains decidedly un-religious, thank you very much.
Rodius -
So many words here. My head hurts.
But first: Will you please share your mom with me? She said exactly what I would have said - your children learn from you by your actions. More than anything else. I can tell from reading you blog that you are a critical thinker, and an incredibly kind soul. The world is in dire need of more like you to make up for those who take on blind faith the words of zealots.
Second: I was "indoctrinated" at an early age, and I'm not sure where my faith lies. I certainly don't buy into what they were selling me back then.
I have to speak up for a moment here. A recovering Catholic (St. Richard - I see I'm not the only one to use that phrase) myself, I don't want to put Thumper into Catholic school or CCD classes. I don't want him to think the only reason to be good or do the right thing is because you'll burn in hell if you don't. I don't want him to base his actions on whether he'll feel guilty afterwards.
Being something of a far-from-perfect Buddhist these days, I hope to teach Thumper to be the best person he can be and to respect all life, not because he'll be punished if he doesn't, but because all life is connected.
How are we going to do that? Well, I guess we're still trying to figure that out and everyone's comments here are appreciated.
Now I need to go roll my chair away from the computer and get some sleep.
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Rodius,
I just had a little more time, and had to come back to read this in more detail. something really stuck with me, and it's the quote about politicians, but the end of it states: "because without the threat of God's wrath, there is no transcendent human motivation to be decent."
I truly believe that that's a load of crap. You will see it yourself first hand very, very soon. Babies and small children are the most decent creatures ever made. You've never witnessed true compassion until your two year old bumps his head in a room full of other two year olds. They all want to kiss it and make it better. They are born decent - it's the world that corrupts them. Create for them a home filled with love and a safe haven to ask questions, even questions that you don't have the answer to, and they will do more good for the world than if they had studied with a thousand preachers.
Thumper will lead the way with his love, and your love for him and each other will be the answer to most of your question. The rest will take care of itself.
To my mother:
I think you bristle at my recollections of my childhood because you take them as criticism. Maybe I'm wrong, but you saying that I wish you'd given me the answers so that I wouldn't have to go through the trouble of asking the questions sounds like a defensive attack. I just want you to know that you and Pops raised me to be the person that I am, and I like that person. A lot. I've occasionally even been accused of being quite full of myself. But I think it's natural for me, as I contemplate the genesis and development of my child, to also contemplate my own genesis and development.
To minivan mom:
I recognize the hypocrisy. That's why I say I'm not sure I could do it. I'm just using this space to think aloud and work out some of my doubts and insecurities about being responsible for another person. I think Mrs. Rodius and I will muddle through as we all do, and make the best choices we can, and do our best to teach our boy to treat all people with the same respect and compassion that he'd treat a close friend because we're all in this together. I don't think that includes sending him off to church without us, but I worry that leaving that part out of it may be doing him a disservice. I recognize that I was capable of learning the human necessity of ethical behavior independent of a religious mandate, but my arrogance tells me that I'm in some ways a special case, and a good many people out there are not capable of making that distinction. But I also recognize that those many people were most likely taught and raised differently, and affected by different experiences, from me. And I hope that Thumper will be capable of learning that too without having to program him before he's too old for the programming to take.
To Saint Richard:
That's the quandry I feel: history shows quite clearly faithful adherence to organized religion can be very destructive. Yet people who've grown up within a faith seem to me to be more likely to have that foundation of faith. Your wife disagrees. And dude, she's pissed at you. Buy her a piece of cake! Oh, wait, better not...
To anniemcq:
I hope that parenthood does teach me that people are essentially good at their heart, and that the evil they commit is a product of the pain and fear to which they are subjected through their lives. So much seems to suggest that people are by nature selfish and arrogant and willing to take advantage of others for their own profit. I think of myself as a good person, but I've had my moments of selfishness and cruelty, just like anyone else. They seem like impulses we learn to overcome.
No, Raudius, no bristling here. Parents can only do what they can do, and see as far as they can see, and we did our best and have nothing to defend. It is what it is.
Now, listen up people--God called and wanted me to say we should give up all the "wrath" business, as there is nothing but love for us in the Universe.
On faith--faith is not rooted in doctrine, but rather in our open-hearted observation of the infinitely intricate and awesomely organized Universe. And children are the best open-hearted observers on the planet.
As always with religion, this debate has bordered on heated at times, but I've enjoyed it. And Raudius, sometimes you just take me too darned seriously. I think I'm done with this one now!
As I tiredly catch up on the comments left in my absence (we were at the beach for the weekend) I realize that we can DEFINITELY be friends (and that includes Mrs. Rodius). I realize you could have very easily taken offense at my heated rantings about hypocrisy (which, truly, weren't directed at YOU rather the whole idea - I get riled up over religion. Which if you've read my blog for any length of time, you know) but you took it in such good stride. Thanks. I swear, in person I don't tend to go off like that...unless it's directed at Saint Richard. :)
Who is back in my good graces, btw, and it didn't even take cake.
I understood the "hypocrisy" comment; it was a fair question. PureLight seemed to think this got heated, and maybe that word was why, but I wasn't feeling any animosity. I'm glad St. Rich is back on the A list; he seems to move on and off of it with some frequency!
Ah the perils of being Mr. MTAMM...This horse is fairly dead, and I hate to beat it, but I will say this: The fact that you are debating this (in your head, in your writing, with your friends and family) means that Thumper is going to turn out all right in this department. Because you care. Because you aren't going to let this go. Because you will set an example for him simply by asking the questions.
It also tells me something vitally more important....that we definitely need to hang out. I suspected Mrs. Rodius must be pretty darn cool, but now that I know she's a recovering catholic / far-from-perfect Buddhist, I'm convinced.
Let me give some advice straight from the kid's mouth. I went to an Assembly of God church for awhile as a kid and loved it. My mom let me bring Barbies in case I got bored. We sang the hymns in the truck the whole rest of the day. It truly was a bonding-with-the-universe experience. Then my mom got remarried, and we started going to a really boring Methodist church with lots of hypocritical b****es and their hypocritical spouses. Think Rev. and Mrs. Lovejoy. Then my parents started dropping me off at church and picking me up when it was over. B.S. to the extreme! So whatever you do, don't do that. Then we all just stayed home on Sundays, and that was when I really felt free to cobble together my own belief system (as I have said before, ad nauseam). But please, please! for me! don't drop your kid off at church. He'll see right through it.
Post a Comment